<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (11) TMI 238 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200348</link>
    <description>A solitary smuggling incident may support preventive detention where the surrounding facts show prior arrangement, conscious participation and a reasonable basis to apprehend repetition. Delay in dealing with the detenu&#039;s representation will not vitiate detention if the interval is explained by legitimate consultation and shows no avoidable procrastination. Delay in passing or executing the detention order is likewise not fatal when accounted for by screening, translation, tracing the detenu and other administrative steps. The note also states that the Central Government&#039;s scrutiny under the COFEPOSA framework is satisfied when the record shows prompt consideration of the State report and a timely decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 30 Nov 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2018 15:36:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=514745" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (11) TMI 238 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200348</link>
      <description>A solitary smuggling incident may support preventive detention where the surrounding facts show prior arrangement, conscious participation and a reasonable basis to apprehend repetition. Delay in dealing with the detenu&#039;s representation will not vitiate detention if the interval is explained by legitimate consultation and shows no avoidable procrastination. Delay in passing or executing the detention order is likewise not fatal when accounted for by screening, translation, tracing the detenu and other administrative steps. The note also states that the Central Government&#039;s scrutiny under the COFEPOSA framework is satisfied when the record shows prompt consideration of the State report and a timely decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 Nov 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200348</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>