<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (11) TMI 238 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200348</link>
    <description>Preventive detention for smuggling may rest on a solitary incident where surrounding facts show prior preparation, conscious participation in concealing contraband, and a reasonable apprehension of repetition. Consideration of a detenu&#039;s representation after obtaining comments from the sponsoring authority does not invalidate continued detention where the process shows diligence and no avoidable delay. Time taken to pass or execute a detention order may be justified by administrative processing, translation requirements, and efforts to trace a person released on bail. Statutory scrutiny of detention under the COFEPOSA framework remains valid when undertaken with reasonable expedition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 30 Nov 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2018 15:36:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=514745" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (11) TMI 238 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200348</link>
      <description>Preventive detention for smuggling may rest on a solitary incident where surrounding facts show prior preparation, conscious participation in concealing contraband, and a reasonable apprehension of repetition. Consideration of a detenu&#039;s representation after obtaining comments from the sponsoring authority does not invalidate continued detention where the process shows diligence and no avoidable delay. Time taken to pass or execute a detention order may be justified by administrative processing, translation requirements, and efforts to trace a person released on bail. Statutory scrutiny of detention under the COFEPOSA framework remains valid when undertaken with reasonable expedition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 Nov 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200348</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>