https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200347 The SC upheld the requirement of depositing seventy-five per cent of the award amount before setting aside a decree under Section 19 of the 2006 Act. The Court concluded that the provision does not allow for discretion to waive or reduce the pre-deposit amount, dismissing the Petitions but allowing an extended period for deposit. The challenge was not against the validity of Section 19 but for a more lenient interpretation. The Court declined to interfere with the lower court's decision and extended the time for pre-deposit by twelve weeks for one party. en-us Thu, 15 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 23 Oct 2021 10:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200347 The SC upheld the requirement of depositing seventy-five per cent of the award amount before setting aside a decree under Section 19 of the 2006 Act. The Court concluded that the provision does not allow for discretion to waive or reduce the pre-deposit amount, dismissing the Petitions but allowing an extended period for deposit. The challenge was not against the validity of Section 19 but for a more lenient interpretation. The Court declined to interfere with the lower court's decision and extended the time for pre-deposit by twelve weeks for one party. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 15 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200347