<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1969 (9) TMI 123 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200346</link>
    <description>A private limited company may be treated as a quasi-partnership where it was formed and conducted on the basis of mutual confidence, shared management and closely connected groups; in that setting, breakdown of confidence and exclusion from management can justify winding up on just and equitable grounds. The partnership principle is not limited to deadlock, and the relevant inquiry is whether the company&#039;s continuance has become impossible in substance. As the final hearing had not yet occurred in the trial court, the appellate court allowed the appeals, set aside the impugned order, and remanded the winding-up petition, provisional liquidator application and injunction application for rehearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2018 15:05:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=514743" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1969 (9) TMI 123 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200346</link>
      <description>A private limited company may be treated as a quasi-partnership where it was formed and conducted on the basis of mutual confidence, shared management and closely connected groups; in that setting, breakdown of confidence and exclusion from management can justify winding up on just and equitable grounds. The partnership principle is not limited to deadlock, and the relevant inquiry is whether the company&#039;s continuance has become impossible in substance. As the final hearing had not yet occurred in the trial court, the appellate court allowed the appeals, set aside the impugned order, and remanded the winding-up petition, provisional liquidator application and injunction application for rehearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200346</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>