<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1347 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200345</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the confirmation of duty and interest but set aside the penalty imposed under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The appellant&#039;s financial difficulties and compliance with tax laws were considered, leading to the decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2018 15:03:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=514740" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1347 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200345</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the confirmation of duty and interest but set aside the penalty imposed under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The appellant&#039;s financial difficulties and compliance with tax laws were considered, leading to the decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200345</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>