<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1918 (11) TMI 2 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200341</link>
    <description>A transfer by an insolvent that has not been annulled under the Provincial Insolvency Act remains voidable, not void ab initio, and continues to operate until set aside by the insolvency court exercising special jurisdiction. That annulment power belongs to the court seized of the insolvency proceedings, and a purchaser from the Official Receiver cannot invoke the transferor&#039;s insolvency challenge as an equitable defence in ordinary civil proceedings. Where the transfer was for consideration and outside the statutory period for a voluntary transfer, the defence was unavailable and the transfer could not be treated as ineffective in the suit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 1918 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2018 14:32:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=514736" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1918 (11) TMI 2 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200341</link>
      <description>A transfer by an insolvent that has not been annulled under the Provincial Insolvency Act remains voidable, not void ab initio, and continues to operate until set aside by the insolvency court exercising special jurisdiction. That annulment power belongs to the court seized of the insolvency proceedings, and a purchaser from the Official Receiver cannot invoke the transferor&#039;s insolvency challenge as an equitable defence in ordinary civil proceedings. Where the transfer was for consideration and outside the statutory period for a voluntary transfer, the defence was unavailable and the transfer could not be treated as ineffective in the suit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 1918 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200341</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>