https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200339 The court dismissed the appeal, affirming that the receiver's execution application was timely and Meenakshi Achi's applications were lawful until the annulment of the transfer. The annulment did not retroactively affect her right to execute the decree. The Official Receiver could rely on her applications to avoid the limitation bar. The court upheld the validity of the transfer until annulled and ruled in favor of the respondent, dismissing the appeal with costs. en-us Fri, 28 Aug 1959 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 26 Mar 2018 14:18:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200339 The court dismissed the appeal, affirming that the receiver's execution application was timely and Meenakshi Achi's applications were lawful until the annulment of the transfer. The annulment did not retroactively affect her right to execute the decree. The Official Receiver could rely on her applications to avoid the limitation bar. The court upheld the validity of the transfer until annulled and ruled in favor of the respondent, dismissing the appeal with costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 28 Aug 1959 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200339