<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (6) TMI 5 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12461</link>
    <description>A reassessment notice under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was challenged in writ jurisdiction as without jurisdiction and illegal. The High Court found no infirmity in the notice and no want of jurisdiction on the facts placed before it, so it declined to interfere with the single judge&#039;s order dismissing the writ petition. The assessee was left to submit an explanation before the assessing authorities and to pursue the statutory remedies available in law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 15:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=51473" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (6) TMI 5 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12461</link>
      <description>A reassessment notice under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was challenged in writ jurisdiction as without jurisdiction and illegal. The High Court found no infirmity in the notice and no want of jurisdiction on the facts placed before it, so it declined to interfere with the single judge&#039;s order dismissing the writ petition. The assessee was left to submit an explanation before the assessing authorities and to pursue the statutory remedies available in law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12461</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>