<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (6) TMI 253 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200333</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appeal, ruling that the Doctrine of Promissory Estoppel does not compel the Government to proceed with land acquisition under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Government&#039;s power to withdraw from acquisition under Section 48 is sovereign and not limited by estoppel. Allegations of malafides favoring certain individuals were deemed unfounded. The court held that the Government had the right to withdraw from the acquisition process, as no final declaration had been issued, and possession had not been taken.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2018 12:20:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=514727" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (6) TMI 253 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200333</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appeal, ruling that the Doctrine of Promissory Estoppel does not compel the Government to proceed with land acquisition under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Government&#039;s power to withdraw from acquisition under Section 48 is sovereign and not limited by estoppel. Allegations of malafides favoring certain individuals were deemed unfounded. The court held that the Government had the right to withdraw from the acquisition process, as no final declaration had been issued, and possession had not been taken.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200333</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>