https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200330 Auction licence conditions required payment of the full licence fee in instalments, even if the quantity of liquor actually supplied or lifted fell short, with only the contractually specified proportionate refund available. Licensees who defaulted in instalment payments but continued to operate the vends for the licence year could not repudiate the agreed contractual burden while retaining the benefits of the licences. The extraordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 226 was not available to relieve parties from voluntary obligations accepted under auction terms. Recovery based on the full contractual liability therefore stood, and liability could not be confined to actual supply or lifting. en-us Fri, 30 Apr 1976 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 26 Mar 2018 11:53:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200330 Auction licence conditions required payment of the full licence fee in instalments, even if the quantity of liquor actually supplied or lifted fell short, with only the contractually specified proportionate refund available. Licensees who defaulted in instalment payments but continued to operate the vends for the licence year could not repudiate the agreed contractual burden while retaining the benefits of the licences. The extraordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 226 was not available to relieve parties from voluntary obligations accepted under auction terms. Recovery based on the full contractual liability therefore stood, and liability could not be confined to actual supply or lifting. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 30 Apr 1976 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200330