https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200329 The appeal against conviction and sentence under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 was dismissed. The challenge to the legality of the sanction order was rejected as the order was found to have considered all relevant facts. The appellant's claim of no bribe demand was dismissed, with both trial court and High Court affirming the demand based on witness testimonies. The courts upheld the conviction, noting the meticulous trap orchestrated by the prosecution. The appeal was dismissed based on the established demand for bribe, leading to the conviction under the Act. en-us Wed, 15 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 26 Mar 2018 11:48:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200329 The appeal against conviction and sentence under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 was dismissed. The challenge to the legality of the sanction order was rejected as the order was found to have considered all relevant facts. The appellant's claim of no bribe demand was dismissed, with both trial court and High Court affirming the demand based on witness testimonies. The courts upheld the conviction, noting the meticulous trap orchestrated by the prosecution. The appeal was dismissed based on the established demand for bribe, leading to the conviction under the Act. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 15 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200329