https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200328 The Supreme Court upheld the termination of a temporary Civil Judge's services under Rule 12 of the Madhya Pradesh Government Servants Rules. The Court found the termination was not punitive but in line with rules for temporary government servants. The appellant's arguments on the constitutionality of Rule 12, consultation requirements with the State Public Service Commission, and violation of natural justice principles were dismissed. The Court ruled that Rule 12 applied uniformly, consultation was not mandatory, and the termination was not punitive. The State Government's decision to terminate based on the High Court's recommendation was deemed appropriate. en-us Tue, 29 Apr 1969 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 26 Mar 2018 11:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200328 The Supreme Court upheld the termination of a temporary Civil Judge's services under Rule 12 of the Madhya Pradesh Government Servants Rules. The Court found the termination was not punitive but in line with rules for temporary government servants. The appellant's arguments on the constitutionality of Rule 12, consultation requirements with the State Public Service Commission, and violation of natural justice principles were dismissed. The Court ruled that Rule 12 applied uniformly, consultation was not mandatory, and the termination was not punitive. The State Government's decision to terminate based on the High Court's recommendation was deemed appropriate. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 29 Apr 1969 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200328