https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200325 Sanction for prosecution under the Prevention of Corruption Act was upheld because the sanction order reflected consideration of the alleged demand and acceptance of illegal gratification, the relevant documents, and witness statements, showing prima facie application of mind. The Court treated sanction as an administrative safeguard and held that its adequacy cannot be rejected on hyper-technical grounds when the order discloses due consideration of material. The High Court's refusal to grant leave to appeal against acquittal on the basis of an allegedly defective sanction was found unjustified, and the matter was remitted for consideration in accordance with law. en-us Tue, 28 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 Jul 2023 13:15:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200325 Sanction for prosecution under the Prevention of Corruption Act was upheld because the sanction order reflected consideration of the alleged demand and acceptance of illegal gratification, the relevant documents, and witness statements, showing prima facie application of mind. The Court treated sanction as an administrative safeguard and held that its adequacy cannot be rejected on hyper-technical grounds when the order discloses due consideration of material. The High Court's refusal to grant leave to appeal against acquittal on the basis of an allegedly defective sanction was found unjustified, and the matter was remitted for consideration in accordance with law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 28 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200325