https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200315 The court allowed the appeal and decreed in favor of the plaintiff in a case concerning the right to succeed to a mohantship. The court held that the plaintiff, as the senior chela, was entitled to succeed under the 1908 will, which was not effectively revoked by the invalid 1918 dispositions. The court found that the 1918 nominations were ultra vires and void, and the mutual ekrarnamas executed in 1919 did not estop the plaintiff. Consequently, the plaintiff was not estopped from claiming the office of gadinashin mohant, and the defendant was ordered to bear the costs. en-us Fri, 27 Feb 1925 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 26 Mar 2018 10:25:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200315 The court allowed the appeal and decreed in favor of the plaintiff in a case concerning the right to succeed to a mohantship. The court held that the plaintiff, as the senior chela, was entitled to succeed under the 1908 will, which was not effectively revoked by the invalid 1918 dispositions. The court found that the 1918 nominations were ultra vires and void, and the mutual ekrarnamas executed in 1919 did not estop the plaintiff. Consequently, the plaintiff was not estopped from claiming the office of gadinashin mohant, and the defendant was ordered to bear the costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 27 Feb 1925 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200315