<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1319 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357616</link>
    <description>An assignee of financial debt can be treated as a financial creditor for Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, and objections to stamp duty, registration, or the mortgaged asset nature of the assignment deed did not prevent reliance on the deed where the assignment was otherwise validly invoked. The Tribunal also found the petition competent because it was filed by an authorised representative under a valid resolution, and technical name discrepancies were not substantive. On the evidence of loan documents, debt acknowledgements, certified account statements, and non-payment, default was shown; exact quantification of debt was not required at admission. The petition was admitted, moratorium ordered, and an interim resolution professional appointed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2018 21:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=514679" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1319 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357616</link>
      <description>An assignee of financial debt can be treated as a financial creditor for Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, and objections to stamp duty, registration, or the mortgaged asset nature of the assignment deed did not prevent reliance on the deed where the assignment was otherwise validly invoked. The Tribunal also found the petition competent because it was filed by an authorised representative under a valid resolution, and technical name discrepancies were not substantive. On the evidence of loan documents, debt acknowledgements, certified account statements, and non-payment, default was shown; exact quantification of debt was not required at admission. The petition was admitted, moratorium ordered, and an interim resolution professional appointed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357616</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>