https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357593 The court dismissed the writ appeal, upholding the principle that statutory remedies must be exhausted before resorting to writ jurisdiction, particularly in revenue matters. The court emphasized the availability of an alternative remedy under Section 129 A(1) of the Customs Act, 1962, and cited precedents to support its decision. The court concluded that there was no material illegality or irregularity in the impugned order, leading to the closure of the connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition. en-us Mon, 19 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 26 Mar 2018 08:37:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357593 The court dismissed the writ appeal, upholding the principle that statutory remedies must be exhausted before resorting to writ jurisdiction, particularly in revenue matters. The court emphasized the availability of an alternative remedy under Section 129 A(1) of the Customs Act, 1962, and cited precedents to support its decision. The court concluded that there was no material illegality or irregularity in the impugned order, leading to the closure of the connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 19 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357593