<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1285 - CESTAT, ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357582</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by M/s Saahil Enterprises against the Order-in-Appeal regarding a Service Tax demand, as the allegations of failure to satisfy Pure Agent conditions were found unsubstantiated due to lack of specific contractual references in the Show Cause Notice. The appellant was deemed entitled to consequential relief, emphasizing the importance of precise allegations and proper documentation in legal proceedings, particularly in tax cases, to ensure procedural fairness and a just outcome.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2018 15:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=514645" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1285 - CESTAT, ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357582</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by M/s Saahil Enterprises against the Order-in-Appeal regarding a Service Tax demand, as the allegations of failure to satisfy Pure Agent conditions were found unsubstantiated due to lack of specific contractual references in the Show Cause Notice. The appellant was deemed entitled to consequential relief, emphasizing the importance of precise allegations and proper documentation in legal proceedings, particularly in tax cases, to ensure procedural fairness and a just outcome.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357582</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>