<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1280 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357577</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the disallowance of Cenvat credit for non-compliance with Rule 4(7) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, in favor of the appellant. Relying on established legal principles and precedents, the Tribunal found the Department&#039;s decision unsustainable and allowed the appeal. The judgment emphasized the importance of considering specific circumstances and legal precedents in determining Cenvat credit eligibility, highlighting the need for a comprehensive analysis for a fair resolution in such disputes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2018 12:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=514640" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1280 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357577</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the disallowance of Cenvat credit for non-compliance with Rule 4(7) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, in favor of the appellant. Relying on established legal principles and precedents, the Tribunal found the Department&#039;s decision unsustainable and allowed the appeal. The judgment emphasized the importance of considering specific circumstances and legal precedents in determining Cenvat credit eligibility, highlighting the need for a comprehensive analysis for a fair resolution in such disputes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357577</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>