<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1275 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357572</link>
    <description>Computer upgrade units fitted into existing systems and used only to enhance memory, speed, storage, printing capacity and connectivity were not complete computers under Chapter 8471. Because the other essential components remained unchanged and the units operated only as a sub-assembly or part of the existing system, classification as a complete machine was rejected. The classification under Chapter 8473 as a part or sub-assembly was upheld, and the challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2018 15:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=514635" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1275 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357572</link>
      <description>Computer upgrade units fitted into existing systems and used only to enhance memory, speed, storage, printing capacity and connectivity were not complete computers under Chapter 8471. Because the other essential components remained unchanged and the units operated only as a sub-assembly or part of the existing system, classification as a complete machine was rejected. The classification under Chapter 8473 as a part or sub-assembly was upheld, and the challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357572</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>