<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 970 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200305</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order, allowing the deduction under section 80IB(10) for the completed portions of the housing project. The Tribunal ruled that the amended provisions could not be applied retroactively to transactions completed before their introduction, thus rejecting the Revenue&#039;s argument.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2018 18:52:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=514613" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 970 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200305</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order, allowing the deduction under section 80IB(10) for the completed portions of the housing project. The Tribunal ruled that the amended provisions could not be applied retroactively to transactions completed before their introduction, thus rejecting the Revenue&#039;s argument.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200305</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>