<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (2) TMI 320 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200283</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appeal, ruling that the deed constituted a sale with a condition of repurchase. The judgment emphasized analyzing the intention of the parties and legal principles to determine the transaction&#039;s nature. The parties were instructed to bear their own costs due to the extensive litigation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2018 16:53:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=514599" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (2) TMI 320 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200283</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appeal, ruling that the deed constituted a sale with a condition of repurchase. The judgment emphasized analyzing the intention of the parties and legal principles to determine the transaction&#039;s nature. The parties were instructed to bear their own costs due to the extensive litigation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200283</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>