<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1952 (12) TMI 39 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200282</link>
    <description>A sale deed accompanied by a separate agreement to reconvey could not be treated as a mortgage under the proviso to Section 58(c) of the Transfer of Property Act. The proviso was read as excluding any inquiry into whether such a transaction, when the stipulation for retransfer is not contained in the same document, can be characterised as a mortgage. The court rejected the argument that the word &quot;deemed&quot; permits treatment of the arrangement as any mortgage other than a mortgage by conditional sale. As the condition was in a separate document, the transaction was not a mortgage and redemption was not available.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 1952 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2018 16:49:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=514598" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1952 (12) TMI 39 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200282</link>
      <description>A sale deed accompanied by a separate agreement to reconvey could not be treated as a mortgage under the proviso to Section 58(c) of the Transfer of Property Act. The proviso was read as excluding any inquiry into whether such a transaction, when the stipulation for retransfer is not contained in the same document, can be characterised as a mortgage. The court rejected the argument that the word &quot;deemed&quot; permits treatment of the arrangement as any mortgage other than a mortgage by conditional sale. As the condition was in a separate document, the transaction was not a mortgage and redemption was not available.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 1952 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200282</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>