https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200281 A guardian may validly alienate minors' share for legal necessity where the facts found support such necessity, and the earlier family deaths did not attract the Succession Act of 1865 on the record before the Court; the sale was therefore upheld. Although the sale and surrender were admitted to form one transaction, distinct consideration was allocated to each part, and in the absence of a plea challenging that allocation, the transaction could not be reworked by treating the sale consideration as dependent on the surrender. The lower appellate court erred in dissecting the mixed transaction, and the suit was dismissed. en-us Thu, 21 Aug 1930 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 24 Mar 2018 16:34:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200281 A guardian may validly alienate minors' share for legal necessity where the facts found support such necessity, and the earlier family deaths did not attract the Succession Act of 1865 on the record before the Court; the sale was therefore upheld. Although the sale and surrender were admitted to form one transaction, distinct consideration was allocated to each part, and in the absence of a plea challenging that allocation, the transaction could not be reworked by treating the sale consideration as dependent on the surrender. The lower appellate court erred in dissecting the mixed transaction, and the suit was dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 21 Aug 1930 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200281