https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200279 The court upheld the sale of villages as a single transaction with the surrender of occupancy rights being void. It separated the legal sale of villages from the illegal surrender, allowing the former to stand. The court found the sale beneficial to the family, dismissing the necessity argument. The court modified the lower court's decree, dismissing the suit to set aside the sale but confirming joint possession of sir land. Each party was to bear its own costs in both courts. en-us Wed, 12 Nov 1924 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 24 Mar 2018 16:23:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200279 The court upheld the sale of villages as a single transaction with the surrender of occupancy rights being void. It separated the legal sale of villages from the illegal surrender, allowing the former to stand. The court found the sale beneficial to the family, dismissing the necessity argument. The court modified the lower court's decree, dismissing the suit to set aside the sale but confirming joint possession of sir land. Each party was to bear its own costs in both courts. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 12 Nov 1924 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200279