<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (3) TMI 372 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200276</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition challenging the rule prohibiting migration from the Medical College. It held that the rule did not violate Article 14 of the Constitution of India, as it was reasonably connected to the institute&#039;s objectives. The court also found that the Medical Council of India guidelines were advisory and not legally binding. Additionally, the court upheld the institute&#039;s discretion in granting No Objection Certificates (N.O.C.s) and concluded that the petitioner&#039;s failure to meet procedural requirements for transfer further weakened her case. The petition was dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2018 16:03:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=514589" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (3) TMI 372 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200276</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition challenging the rule prohibiting migration from the Medical College. It held that the rule did not violate Article 14 of the Constitution of India, as it was reasonably connected to the institute&#039;s objectives. The court also found that the Medical Council of India guidelines were advisory and not legally binding. Additionally, the court upheld the institute&#039;s discretion in granting No Objection Certificates (N.O.C.s) and concluded that the petitioner&#039;s failure to meet procedural requirements for transfer further weakened her case. The petition was dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200276</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>