https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200274 Rules on recognition and grant-in-aid under the Madras Elementary Education Act, 1920, after the relevant provisions were repealed, were not statutory rules enforceable by a teacher against private school management. The remaining rule-making power did not alter the master-and-servant relationship created by the employment contract. The Part II rules operated only as administrative instructions governing the Government's decision to grant or withdraw recognition and aid, and any enforcement lay between the Government and the management. A teacher therefore had no independent civil right to enforce an appellate reinstatement order against the management. en-us Tue, 16 Mar 1971 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 24 Mar 2018 15:29:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200274 Rules on recognition and grant-in-aid under the Madras Elementary Education Act, 1920, after the relevant provisions were repealed, were not statutory rules enforceable by a teacher against private school management. The remaining rule-making power did not alter the master-and-servant relationship created by the employment contract. The Part II rules operated only as administrative instructions governing the Government's decision to grant or withdraw recognition and aid, and any enforcement lay between the Government and the management. A teacher therefore had no independent civil right to enforce an appellate reinstatement order against the management. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 16 Mar 1971 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200274