https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200267 A councillor's resignation is valid only if made in writing under hand, and an alleged acceptance in an adjourned meeting without any agenda for resignation had no legal effect; the later supervisory cancellation also confirmed the illegality. The Court further construed "calendar year" as 365 days and held that the statutory bar on repeating a no-confidence motion applies only where a resolution has actually been moved in the legal sense. An abortive proceeding that failed for want of quorum and was annulled did not amount to a moved resolution, so a subsequent motion against the Chairperson was not barred. en-us Fri, 22 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 24 Mar 2018 15:10:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200267 A councillor's resignation is valid only if made in writing under hand, and an alleged acceptance in an adjourned meeting without any agenda for resignation had no legal effect; the later supervisory cancellation also confirmed the illegality. The Court further construed "calendar year" as 365 days and held that the statutory bar on repeating a no-confidence motion applies only where a resolution has actually been moved in the legal sense. An abortive proceeding that failed for want of quorum and was annulled did not amount to a moved resolution, so a subsequent motion against the Chairperson was not barred. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 22 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200267