<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1959 (2) TMI 33 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200266</link>
    <description>Directions issued by a State Government under section 43A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 were treated as administrative instructions regulating transport authorities, not as retrospective law altering adjudicatory rights in stage carriage permit matters. The permit-granting function under Chapter IV remained quasi-judicial and had to be assessed under section 47 on public-interest considerations. The Government order could guide the appellate authority, but it did not create a vested right in favour of an applicant or confer a superior claim merely because an earlier application had been decided differently. The appeal was therefore to be determined by the applicable administrative directions and the public-interest test.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 1959 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2018 15:04:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=514569" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1959 (2) TMI 33 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200266</link>
      <description>Directions issued by a State Government under section 43A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 were treated as administrative instructions regulating transport authorities, not as retrospective law altering adjudicatory rights in stage carriage permit matters. The permit-granting function under Chapter IV remained quasi-judicial and had to be assessed under section 47 on public-interest considerations. The Government order could guide the appellate authority, but it did not create a vested right in favour of an applicant or confer a superior claim merely because an earlier application had been decided differently. The appeal was therefore to be determined by the applicable administrative directions and the public-interest test.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 1959 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200266</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>