<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (9) TMI 19 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12442</link>
    <description>Disallowance of salary paid to the assessee&#039;s relatives was sustained because the authorities had examined the alleged employees, recorded their statements, and found no proof that services were rendered. The absence of a register was only one factor in the evidentiary assessment, and the close relationship with the assessee further supported the finding that the claim lacked a proper factual basis. On those concurrent findings of fact, no substantial question of law arose under Section 260A, and interference was declined.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 12:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=51454" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (9) TMI 19 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12442</link>
      <description>Disallowance of salary paid to the assessee&#039;s relatives was sustained because the authorities had examined the alleged employees, recorded their statements, and found no proof that services were rendered. The absence of a register was only one factor in the evidentiary assessment, and the close relationship with the assessee further supported the finding that the claim lacked a proper factual basis. On those concurrent findings of fact, no substantial question of law arose under Section 260A, and interference was declined.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12442</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>