https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357561 The court rejected the writ petition challenging the prohibition order against a licensed Customs Broker, emphasizing the need to exhaust the alternative remedy of appeal under Section 129 A of the Customs Act. The court found the prohibition order under Regulation 23 valid, as the broker failed to collect documents directly from the importer and verify client identity, justifying the order to protect revenue interests. The court held that the respondent complied with natural justice principles by providing a post-decisional hearing, concluding no violation occurred. The petitioner was advised to appeal to the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) if desired. en-us Mon, 19 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Nov 2018 14:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357561 The court rejected the writ petition challenging the prohibition order against a licensed Customs Broker, emphasizing the need to exhaust the alternative remedy of appeal under Section 129 A of the Customs Act. The court found the prohibition order under Regulation 23 valid, as the broker failed to collect documents directly from the importer and verify client identity, justifying the order to protect revenue interests. The court held that the respondent complied with natural justice principles by providing a post-decisional hearing, concluding no violation occurred. The petitioner was advised to appeal to the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) if desired. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 19 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357561