https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357560 The tribunal upheld the reclassification of imported goods as dyed nylon taffeta fabric under CTH 54074230, rejecting the assessee's classification under CTH 59031090. The matter was remanded for an expert opinion on the visibility of the coating. Regarding valuation, the enhancement based on contemporaneous imports was rejected, with the tribunal finding it irrelevant. The Revenue's appeal was dismissed, and the assessee's appeal was remanded for fresh consideration. The judgment was delivered by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI. en-us Thu, 01 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 30 Mar 2018 18:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357560 The tribunal upheld the reclassification of imported goods as dyed nylon taffeta fabric under CTH 54074230, rejecting the assessee's classification under CTH 59031090. The matter was remanded for an expert opinion on the visibility of the coating. Regarding valuation, the enhancement based on contemporaneous imports was rejected, with the tribunal finding it irrelevant. The Revenue's appeal was dismissed, and the assessee's appeal was remanded for fresh consideration. The judgment was delivered by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 01 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357560