<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1261 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357558</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal upheld the confiscation of diverted goods, demand of duty, and penalties, except for setting aside certain fines and demands beyond five years. Statements obtained during the investigation were deemed credible evidence. The tribunal rejected arguments for exemption notifications and found the invocation of relevant Customs Act sections appropriate. Penalties under specific sections were upheld for the illegal diversion of goods. Appeals were partially allowed, with penalties upheld for duty evasion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2019 11:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=514479" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1261 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357558</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal upheld the confiscation of diverted goods, demand of duty, and penalties, except for setting aside certain fines and demands beyond five years. Statements obtained during the investigation were deemed credible evidence. The tribunal rejected arguments for exemption notifications and found the invocation of relevant Customs Act sections appropriate. Penalties under specific sections were upheld for the illegal diversion of goods. Appeals were partially allowed, with penalties upheld for duty evasion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357558</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>