<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1253 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357550</link>
    <description>The court held that the petitioner, as a preference shareholder, lacked standing to file for winding up under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956, as preference shareholders are not deemed creditors. The petition to wind up the company was dismissed, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2018 15:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=514471" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1253 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357550</link>
      <description>The court held that the petitioner, as a preference shareholder, lacked standing to file for winding up under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956, as preference shareholders are not deemed creditors. The petition to wind up the company was dismissed, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357550</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>