<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (11) TMI 23 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12435</link>
    <description>A discretionary trust assessed as a representative assessee was treated as entitled to the deduction under section 80C because the trust&#039;s income is assessed in the same manner and to the same extent as the beneficiaries&#039; income. The court applied the earlier principle that such a trust is not to be equated with a Hindu undivided family or an association of persons for this purpose, and that the term &quot;individual&quot; in the Act is wide enough to include a body of individuals constituting a taxable unit. As section 80C was regarded as materially similar to section 80L, the deduction was held allowable and the issue was decided against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 15:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=51447" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (11) TMI 23 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12435</link>
      <description>A discretionary trust assessed as a representative assessee was treated as entitled to the deduction under section 80C because the trust&#039;s income is assessed in the same manner and to the same extent as the beneficiaries&#039; income. The court applied the earlier principle that such a trust is not to be equated with a Hindu undivided family or an association of persons for this purpose, and that the term &quot;individual&quot; in the Act is wide enough to include a body of individuals constituting a taxable unit. As section 80C was regarded as materially similar to section 80L, the deduction was held allowable and the issue was decided against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12435</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>