<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1227 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357524</link>
    <description>The appellant, engaged in manufacturing power cables, appealed against an order demanding excise duty on waste packing material, particularly floor sweeping. The Tribunal held that floor sweeping did not qualify as a product intentionally manufactured by the appellant based on precedents. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the order demanding excise duty, ruling in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2022 15:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=514445" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1227 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357524</link>
      <description>The appellant, engaged in manufacturing power cables, appealed against an order demanding excise duty on waste packing material, particularly floor sweeping. The Tribunal held that floor sweeping did not qualify as a product intentionally manufactured by the appellant based on precedents. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the order demanding excise duty, ruling in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357524</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>