https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357520 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI set aside an order upholding the appropriation of two sanctioned refunds against confirmed demands, finding that the duty liability from the remaining matters had been fully discharged by the appellant based on Tribunal decisions. The Tribunal ruled that there was no scope for recovery through appropriation of the sanctioned rebate amounts, emphasizing the importance of accurate appropriation of refunds towards duty liabilities arising from confirmed demands based on Tribunal decisions and specific order-in-original numbers. The appeal was allowed, highlighting the significance of proper analysis in such cases. en-us Fri, 27 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 24 Mar 2018 08:40:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357520 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI set aside an order upholding the appropriation of two sanctioned refunds against confirmed demands, finding that the duty liability from the remaining matters had been fully discharged by the appellant based on Tribunal decisions. The Tribunal ruled that there was no scope for recovery through appropriation of the sanctioned rebate amounts, emphasizing the importance of accurate appropriation of refunds towards duty liabilities arising from confirmed demands based on Tribunal decisions and specific order-in-original numbers. The appeal was allowed, highlighting the significance of proper analysis in such cases. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 27 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357520