https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357515 A quasi-judicial reassessment order denying input tax credit was vulnerable in writ jurisdiction because the authority did not consider the assessee's reply and supporting documents, gave no reasons, and failed to examine the transaction structure and related registration details. The existence of an alternative appellate remedy did not bar interference where the decision-making process showed non-application of mind and procedural unfairness. The reassessment order and connected demand were set aside, and the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication after hearing the assessee and passing a speaking order. en-us Tue, 13 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 24 Mar 2018 08:39:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357515 A quasi-judicial reassessment order denying input tax credit was vulnerable in writ jurisdiction because the authority did not consider the assessee's reply and supporting documents, gave no reasons, and failed to examine the transaction structure and related registration details. The existence of an alternative appellate remedy did not bar interference where the decision-making process showed non-application of mind and procedural unfairness. The reassessment order and connected demand were set aside, and the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication after hearing the assessee and passing a speaking order. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 13 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357515