<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1210 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357507</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision. It held that the land should be treated as stock-in-trade post-conversion, allowing the business loss incurred due to non-receipt of sale consideration in computing taxable income. The court agreed with the Tribunal&#039;s application of Section 45(2) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal&#039;s order was upheld, answering substantial legal questions against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2018 18:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=514428" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1210 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357507</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision. It held that the land should be treated as stock-in-trade post-conversion, allowing the business loss incurred due to non-receipt of sale consideration in computing taxable income. The court agreed with the Tribunal&#039;s application of Section 45(2) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal&#039;s order was upheld, answering substantial legal questions against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357507</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>