<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1207 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357504</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing the importance of specifying the grounds for penalty initiation to ensure procedural fairness. The judgment highlighted the need for alignment between the grounds for initiating penalty proceedings and those for imposing penalties, leading to the quashing of the penalty in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2018 08:39:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=514425" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1207 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357504</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing the importance of specifying the grounds for penalty initiation to ensure procedural fairness. The judgment highlighted the need for alignment between the grounds for initiating penalty proceedings and those for imposing penalties, leading to the quashing of the penalty in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357504</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>