<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1202 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357499</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, finding that the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 could not be upheld due to a defective show cause notice issued under Section 274 of the Act. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of specifying the charge in the notice, following the precedent set by the Karnataka High Court. As a result, the penalty was deleted, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2018 08:39:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=514420" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1202 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357499</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, finding that the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 could not be upheld due to a defective show cause notice issued under Section 274 of the Act. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of specifying the charge in the notice, following the precedent set by the Karnataka High Court. As a result, the penalty was deleted, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357499</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>