<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1189 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357486</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals for AY 2012-13 and AY 2013-14, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions to delete disallowances under section 14A, additions under section 68, and disallowances of interest payments. The ITAT emphasized the need for thorough investigations by the AO before making additions under section 68. The cross-objections by the assessee were partly allowed, supporting the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2018 17:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=514407" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1189 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357486</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals for AY 2012-13 and AY 2013-14, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions to delete disallowances under section 14A, additions under section 68, and disallowances of interest payments. The ITAT emphasized the need for thorough investigations by the AO before making additions under section 68. The cross-objections by the assessee were partly allowed, supporting the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357486</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>