https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200245 Review jurisdiction is confined to an error apparent on the face of the record, new and important evidence, or other narrowly recognised sufficient reason, and it cannot be used to reargue matters that belong in appeal. A review petition challenging conditions imposed for release of detained goods was therefore outside the permissible scope and not maintainable. The filing of false statements and doubtful documents, including inconsistent explanations about a building plan and the absence of a permit, was treated as a serious abuse of process. That conduct justified dismissal of the review petition with costs. en-us Mon, 08 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 24 Mar 2018 08:38:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200245 Review jurisdiction is confined to an error apparent on the face of the record, new and important evidence, or other narrowly recognised sufficient reason, and it cannot be used to reargue matters that belong in appeal. A review petition challenging conditions imposed for release of detained goods was therefore outside the permissible scope and not maintainable. The filing of false statements and doubtful documents, including inconsistent explanations about a building plan and the absence of a permit, was treated as a serious abuse of process. That conduct justified dismissal of the review petition with costs. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 08 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200245