<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 1118 - ATFEMA NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200229</link>
    <description>Procedural compliance and specificity were central to the discussion of appeal maintainability and document discovery in PMLA proceedings. The text states that an appeal was not to be rejected merely for lack of the impugned order, but relief was weakened by failure to follow the prescribed procedure for inspection and certified copies. It further notes that the power to summon documents under section 11 is discretionary and requires clear relevance and specificity; broad, generic requests amount to a fishing exercise and may be seen as delaying time-bound adjudication. It also records that relief affecting attached shares could not be granted without the company, treated as a necessary party.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2018 20:36:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=514398" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 1118 - ATFEMA NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200229</link>
      <description>Procedural compliance and specificity were central to the discussion of appeal maintainability and document discovery in PMLA proceedings. The text states that an appeal was not to be rejected merely for lack of the impugned order, but relief was weakened by failure to follow the prescribed procedure for inspection and certified copies. It further notes that the power to summon documents under section 11 is discretionary and requires clear relevance and specificity; broad, generic requests amount to a fishing exercise and may be seen as delaying time-bound adjudication. It also records that relief affecting attached shares could not be granted without the company, treated as a necessary party.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200229</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>