<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1542 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200233</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the penalty proceedings were invalid due to the failure to specify the exact charge in the show cause notice. Additionally, the penalty for concealment should be computed based on the final additions confirmed by the Tribunal. As a result, the appeals of both the assessee and the Revenue were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2018 20:36:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=514394" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1542 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200233</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the penalty proceedings were invalid due to the failure to specify the exact charge in the show cause notice. Additionally, the penalty for concealment should be computed based on the final additions confirmed by the Tribunal. As a result, the appeals of both the assessee and the Revenue were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200233</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>