<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 1154 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200235</link>
    <description>Goods ordered for a specific local buyer, imported by the seller under contractual obligation and earmarked for delivery to that buyer, were held to have a direct and inextricable link between the sale and the actual import. On those facts, the transaction satisfied the requirements of a sale in the course of import under section 5(2) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 and could not be treated as an independent local sale. The levy of penalty was therefore unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2018 20:36:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=514392" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 1154 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200235</link>
      <description>Goods ordered for a specific local buyer, imported by the seller under contractual obligation and earmarked for delivery to that buyer, were held to have a direct and inextricable link between the sale and the actual import. On those facts, the transaction satisfied the requirements of a sale in the course of import under section 5(2) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 and could not be treated as an independent local sale. The levy of penalty was therefore unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200235</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>