<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 1197 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200241</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the writ petitions challenging the orders of the Appellate Authority under the TN VAT Act and CST Act for the assessment years 2009-2010 and 2010-2011. The Court set aside the impugned orders, remitting the matter back to the Appellate Authority for reconsideration. The petitioner was granted another opportunity to appear before the Appellate Authority and present their case on merits, with specific instructions to issue a notice to the present address of the petitioner and hear the appeals within a specified timeframe. The Court emphasized that it was not expressing any view on the merits, leaving it to the Appellate Authority to decide.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2018 20:36:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=514386" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 1197 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200241</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the writ petitions challenging the orders of the Appellate Authority under the TN VAT Act and CST Act for the assessment years 2009-2010 and 2010-2011. The Court set aside the impugned orders, remitting the matter back to the Appellate Authority for reconsideration. The petitioner was granted another opportunity to appear before the Appellate Authority and present their case on merits, with specific instructions to issue a notice to the present address of the petitioner and hear the appeals within a specified timeframe. The Court emphasized that it was not expressing any view on the merits, leaving it to the Appellate Authority to decide.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200241</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>