https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200226 Under the Arbitration Act, the time for making an award may be enlarged by the parties' mutual consent even after the arbitrator has entered upon the reference, because section 28(2) invalidates only a unilateral power in the original agreement, not a later consensual extension. The article also notes that an arbitration agreement is not void for vagueness where, read in its commercial and factual context, it identifies the parties, the business, the disputes, and the matters for determination with sufficient certainty. Applied here, the award was not invalid for delay and the arbitration clause remained effective. en-us Wed, 18 Jul 1973 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Mar 2018 18:30:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200226 Under the Arbitration Act, the time for making an award may be enlarged by the parties' mutual consent even after the arbitrator has entered upon the reference, because section 28(2) invalidates only a unilateral power in the original agreement, not a later consensual extension. The article also notes that an arbitration agreement is not void for vagueness where, read in its commercial and factual context, it identifies the parties, the business, the disputes, and the matters for determination with sufficient certainty. Applied here, the award was not invalid for delay and the arbitration clause remained effective. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 18 Jul 1973 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200226