<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1973 (7) TMI 116 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200226</link>
    <description>Post-reference mutual consent may validly extend the time for making an arbitral award under the Arbitration Act. The statutory restriction targets an original agreement granting the arbitrator unilateral power to extend time, not a later consensual modification by the parties; delay therefore did not invalidate the award. An arbitration agreement is not void for vagueness where, read commercially and with its preamble, it identifies the parties, partnership business, accounts and matters for determination. Examination of related accounts for verifying entries does not create uncertainty where the parties understood and acted on the reference without objection. The challenge on these grounds failed, leaving remaining issues for determination according to law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2018 18:30:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=514378" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1973 (7) TMI 116 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200226</link>
      <description>Post-reference mutual consent may validly extend the time for making an arbitral award under the Arbitration Act. The statutory restriction targets an original agreement granting the arbitrator unilateral power to extend time, not a later consensual modification by the parties; delay therefore did not invalidate the award. An arbitration agreement is not void for vagueness where, read commercially and with its preamble, it identifies the parties, partnership business, accounts and matters for determination. Examination of related accounts for verifying entries does not create uncertainty where the parties understood and acted on the reference without objection. The challenge on these grounds failed, leaving remaining issues for determination according to law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200226</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>