https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200225 A trade mark rectification challenge failed because the respondent's registered mark was not found deceptively similar to the appellant's mark. The court compared the marks as a whole, taking into account the nature of the goods, the class of purchasers, and the manner in which the marks were displayed on the machines. It also noted the appellant's long prior use and independent reputation, and that both parties' machines carried the trade mark and registration particulars, reducing the likelihood of confusion. On that assessment, the mark was held not to be likely to deceive or cause confusion. en-us Mon, 01 Feb 1988 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Mar 2018 18:10:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200225 A trade mark rectification challenge failed because the respondent's registered mark was not found deceptively similar to the appellant's mark. The court compared the marks as a whole, taking into account the nature of the goods, the class of purchasers, and the manner in which the marks were displayed on the machines. It also noted the appellant's long prior use and independent reputation, and that both parties' machines carried the trade mark and registration particulars, reducing the likelihood of confusion. On that assessment, the mark was held not to be likely to deceive or cause confusion. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 01 Feb 1988 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200225