<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (3) TMI 453 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200223</link>
    <description>The court upheld the levy of excise duty on packaged tea, deeming the packaging process as &quot;manufacture&quot; under the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. It found the inclusion of packaged tea in the First Schedule valid and constitutional, honoring legislative intent. The court dismissed claims of double taxation, emphasizing the statutory consistency and need to harmonize provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2018 18:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=514371" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (3) TMI 453 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200223</link>
      <description>The court upheld the levy of excise duty on packaged tea, deeming the packaging process as &quot;manufacture&quot; under the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. It found the inclusion of packaged tea in the First Schedule valid and constitutional, honoring legislative intent. The court dismissed claims of double taxation, emphasizing the statutory consistency and need to harmonize provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200223</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>