https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200221 Bail was granted where the allegations involved conspiracy and routing of commissions through connected entities, but the Court found the investigating agency's arrest discretion could not be exercised arbitrarily. The petitioner was treated differently from other family-linked accused, some of whom had not been arrested or even interrogated, and the FIR did not attribute the same company interests to the petitioner; on that totality, bail was justified. The Court also stated that if the charge-sheet is not filed within the statutory period under the default-bail provision, the accused becomes entitled to bail as of right, and noted that filing within time was unlikely. en-us Thu, 28 Jan 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Mar 2018 17:42:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200221 Bail was granted where the allegations involved conspiracy and routing of commissions through connected entities, but the Court found the investigating agency's arrest discretion could not be exercised arbitrarily. The petitioner was treated differently from other family-linked accused, some of whom had not been arrested or even interrogated, and the FIR did not attribute the same company interests to the petitioner; on that totality, bail was justified. The Court also stated that if the charge-sheet is not filed within the statutory period under the default-bail provision, the accused becomes entitled to bail as of right, and noted that filing within time was unlikely. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 28 Jan 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200221