<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1934 (3) TMI 27 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200220</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, granting an injunction against the defendant to prevent the use of the name &quot;Bombay Art Dyers and Cleaners&quot; or any similar name likely to mislead the public. The plaintiff was awarded Rs. 2,550 in damages with six percent interest, and the defendant was ordered to pay costs on scale No. 2.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 1934 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2018 17:39:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=514367" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1934 (3) TMI 27 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200220</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, granting an injunction against the defendant to prevent the use of the name &quot;Bombay Art Dyers and Cleaners&quot; or any similar name likely to mislead the public. The plaintiff was awarded Rs. 2,550 in damages with six percent interest, and the defendant was ordered to pay costs on scale No. 2.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 1934 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200220</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>